[Interview] The Truth About Mainstream Cancer Treatments...
...I could hardly believe it myself...
A dear friend of mine is a rheumatologist living in Mexico City. Doctors have their way of joking around with one another, and she told me the common joke is for the infection specialist to say, “Hey, at least I cure people! What do you do?”, the arthritis docor replies, “Well I don’t cure people, but without my help they wouldn’t even be able to live normal lives! Say, what do you do, oncologist? Prolong people’s suffering a couple months?”
Shockingly, according to mainstream journals which I am cataloguing in my upcoming book(s) the first of which will be Pharma Lie, People Die a couple of months is often optimistic. Not only did I myself find the facts so shocking as to be hard to believe, I set the chapter on oncology to skeptical readers and they couldn’t find fault with my conclusions!
For example: You can get a cancer treatment approved without evern proving that it improves the length or quality of life of patients! All you need to do is demonstrate that it shrinks a tumor! The problem with that is: the onocology literature is full of papers demonstrating that tumor shrinkage is not correlated to better patient outcomes. They can die of the treatment, infections, blood loss, or the tumor cna just bounce back more aggressively a little later.
Meanwhile the “so-called” skeptics are busy hounding acupuncturists and chiropractors! For what harm when the government is squandering untold billions every year on cancer treatments which mainstream journals admit are ineffective?
I discuss some of the data in this show with Christy Prais: